I’ve combed through Reddit discussions to see what real users think about the Owlet Baby Monitor, a popular device designed to track an infant’s oxygen levels and heart rate.
The Good
- Peace of mind for anxious parents: “The Owlet gave her peace of mind. She was able to sleep and even go take a shower without worrying if her baby’s breathing stopped.” (51 upvotes)
- Potentially life-saving alerts: “Just read a post this morning about it saving a baby’s life with RSV when oxygen dropped.” (67 upvotes)
- Worth the false alarms: “The Owlet isn’t perfect but I would gladly react to every false alarm if it catches a real issue once.” (57 upvotes)
- Helpful for parents with SIDS history: “My mom bought us ours because way back in the 70s she had two babies die of SIDS and would’ve given anything to know that her babies were passing.” (69 upvotes)
- Mental health benefit: “As a person with lifelong OCD, it was the only way I got any sleep at night… I was so, so much better off mentally and physically.” (68 upvotes)

The Not So Good
- Marketing to parental anxiety: “Unpopular take – but I feel like there’s so many products that prey on nervous first time moms and this is one of them.” (165 upvotes)
- False readings: “When I went to the ER with my baby who had RSV I made a comment about getting the owlet to monitor her and the doctor said they do not recommend it, that it gives both false low and false high readings.” (184 upvotes)
- Security concerns: “Don’t use a WiFi/internet-connected monitor. When your WiFi goes down, so does your baby monitor… Security concerns as noted in this post.” (75 upvotes)
- Medical skepticism: “I had a NICU baby… Neonatal paediatrician still said she doesn’t recommend them – says they either make people more anxious or complacent.” (59 upvotes)
- Skin irritation/burns: “It’s a common complaint. I don’t see why people continue to use them.” (585 upvotes)
Compared to Alternatives
- Non-WiFi monitors preferred: “We bought a monitor that doesn’t use WiFi for this specific reason. I can’t check it from my phone so I have to carry the monitor around.” (54 upvotes)
- Closed-system alternatives: “We got a Motorola video monitor closed system and I love it. It reaches 1000ft so if baby is sleeping I can go outside or even to the neighbours and it reaches.” (60 upvotes)
- Radio antenna monitors: “You want a baby monitor that runs on a radio antenna like the Infant Optics DXR-8. It’s got a bad screen but the connection is rock solid.” (75 upvotes)
- Budget-friendly: “Hello baby monitor is $50 on Amazon and doesn’t use wifi!” (51 upvotes)
Worth it?
- Worth it for high-risk situations: Parents with premature babies or SIDS history find value despite issues.
- Not worth it for typical situations: “I don’t see why people continue to use them.” (585 upvotes)
- Value depends on parental anxiety: “I wholly disagree with everyone who says using it will add to your anxiety. For me, it’s the only way I’ve been able to relieve it.” (57 upvotes)
Pro Tips
- Age restrictions: “The owlet is only supposed to be used on babies that are 1 month or older. If younger, it’s normal for O2 levels to fluctuate.” (57 upvotes)
- Proper sleep environment: “With a proper infant mattress and tight-fitting sheet with nothing else in the crib, issues should be minimal.” (135 upvotes)
- Swaddling caution: “If your child is swaddled, stop as soon as they start to roll. Reflexes help reposition if O2 drops.” (90 upvotes)
- Initial month advice: “I use it religiously every night on my 9-month-old. But the first month, you just can’t use it effectively.” (57 upvotes)
Final Verdict
Reddit discussions highlight the Owlet baby monitor as a polarizing product. It provides essential reassurance for high-risk infants and anxious parents, yet faces criticism over false alarms, and potential security issues. Yet, for parents with premature babies or SIDS history find value despite issues.


Leave a comment